Categories
Guiding Your Women’s Health Exam
Topic: Guiding Your Women’s Health Exam
Discuss how the female patient’s age, demographics, race, and lifestyle will drive your exam and plan of care. Give examples and support with evidence-based practice.
Rubric Title:
| MSN 20 point Discussion Rubric |
| Criteria 1 | Level III Max Points Points: 4 | Level II Max Points Points: 3.2 | Level I Max Points Points: 2.4 | Not Present 0 Points |
| Identification (20%) | Thorough identification of the importance of the subject matter to the individual, clinical, and professional.Supports discussion concepts through personal experience and evidence-based information.Submits a minimum of three posts, one initial and two responses to either the course faculty or peers, with thorough reflection and content. | Reflection of subject to self, clinical, and professional importance with minimal integration of evidence-based information.Submits two or more posts with some reflection and content. | Minimal reflection without reference to personal, clinical, or profession.Submits one or more posts that have minimal reflection or content. | No Posts |
| Criteria 2 | Level III Max Points Points: 12 | Level II Max Points Points: 9.6 | Level I Max Points Points: 7.2 | Not Present 0 Points |
| Reflection/Participation/Knowledge (60%) | Provides a well-written reflection that is clearly connected to the outcomes and clinical insight. Responds to at least two other student postings with a response that advances the discussion. Clear critical thinking acknowledges application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Replies move the conversation forward. Makes a reply to a question asked in response to their own posting. Builds a focused argument.Asks new or related questions.Makes an oppositional or congruent statement that is supported by experience or research. | Provides a well-written reflection and there is a clear connection to outcomes, but lacks clinical insight. Replies partially move the conversation forward. Makes a reply to question asked in response to their own posting.Some clear critical thinking acknowledges application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.Affirms statements or references to relevant research.Asks similar or related questions within the context of the conversation. | Provides short reflection and there is a slight connection to outcomes.Student does not move the conversation forward within their own post or in their response to peer/faculty. Minimal critical thinking that acknowledges application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.Does not affirm or oppose statements in conversation.Does not pose or ask related question in the context of DB conversation. | No Posts |
| Criteria 3 | Level III Max Points Points: 4 | Level II Max Points Points: 3.2 | Level I Max Points Points: 2.4 | Not Present 0 Points |
| Format/Style/APA/ Citations (20%) | No grammar, word usage, or punctuation errors. Overall style is consistent with professional work. Writing style facilitates communication. Provides three references that are relevant to the content and published within the last five years. | Fewer than three grammatical errors.Provides less than three references that are relevant to the content and published within the last five years. Writing style facilitates some communication. | More than three grammatical errors.Provides less than three references that are relevant to the content and published within the last five years. Writing style does not facilitate communication. | No Posts |
| Maximum Total Points | 20 | 16 | 12 | 0 |
| Minimum Total Points | 17 points minimum | 13 points minimum | 1 point minimum | 0 |
Updated 9/4/2020
